Idaho Dispatch

Your Local Media Ally

Senate Candidate Scott Brock’s Bribery Claim Challenged, Lawsuit Threats Ensue

By • April 20, 2022

Senate Candidate Scott Brock is facing a lawsuit over his claim that Rep. Tammy Nichols was paid for a vote on a bill in 2020 and is threatening a counter-suit.

An image of a tri-fold pamphlet was sent to Idaho Dispatch in which Brock claims that Nichols took money from Medical Recovery Services for a vote. The firm of Smith, Driscoll, and Associates has sent Brock a “cease and desist” letter on behalf of MRS which you can see at the bottom of this article.

Brock’s claim stems from a bill passed through the Idaho legislature in 2020, HB 515, known as the Idaho Patient Act.

HB 515 was “Introduced” on February 14. It was then referred to the Business Committee on February 17.

It was then passed out of the Business Committee with a “Do Pass Recommendation” on February 20.

According to campaign finance records, Nichols logged a donation from MRS on February 10. Nichols told Idaho Dispatch that she reported it on that date but that the check had been sitting in her mailbox longer than that. She added in a statement to Idaho Dispatch,

Contributions that are a $1000 have to be reported within 48 hours. I received the donation and reported it on the 10th to abide by Idaho law.

During the 2020 Idaho legislative session, Nichols received over a dozen donations. One of those donations was for $1,000 from MRS. Nichols had 48 hours to report the donation.

Nichols was the only legislator to receive a donation from MRS in 2020, but the company did donate $1,000 to the Bonneville County Republican Party in September of that year.

Donations during a legislative session taking place in an election year are not uncommon. For instance, Speaker Scott Bedke (R), Rep. Greg Chaney (R), and Sen. Melissa Wintrow (D) all received some campaign contributions during the 2020 legislative session.

Does the donation equate to bribery?

Brock said the donation came in hours before the vote. Based on the date when a vote took place, and the donation was reported, there were at least four days between the deposit and a vote.

Idaho Dispatch asked Brock if he had any evidence of a quid-pro-quo that we could post, but he has not yet responded to that specific question.

Brock did tell Idaho Dispatch the following regarding the bribery claim,

A donation accepted during session, hours before a vote in favor. Public perception is that of corruption.

In the statement Brock sent to Idaho Dispatch, he included a Tweet from an Idaho citizen to support his claim. Here is an image of that Tweet:

MRS also donated to Nichols in 2018 for $1,000.

The image above states that MRS is owned by Bryan Smith, a Republican candidate for Idaho’s 2nd Congressional District. However, Smith told Idaho Dispatch in a phone call that he did not own MRS when the donation in question was made.

Regarding Brock’s claim that Nichols didn’t own property, he told Idaho Dispatch the following,

As for her home ownership, I apologize. The chain of custody of the title information is questionable according to CC records. I should have reviewed the material before it was printed for me.

Finally, Brock had also said Nichols voted against the NRA.

Here is what Brock sent Idaho Dispatch regarding the NRA claim, which appears to be from an email, article, or another source about the bill at the time it was passed:

Yesterday, Governor Brad Little signed shooting range protection legislation, House Bill 396, into law. House Bill 396 passed both chambers of the Idaho Legislature with overwhelming support and will go into effect on July 1st.

House Bill 396: 1) Authorizes the Fish & Game (F&G) Commission to develop, operate and maintain public shooting ranges and to assist in the location or relocation of shooting ranges; 2) Empowers the F&G Director to consult with other agencies to identify land suitable for shooting ranges; and 3) Establishes a Public Shooting Range Fund for the purpose of establishing and preserving public shooting ranges throughout Idaho.

Firearm shooting ranges have established a long tradition of service to a wide variety of citizen groups in local communities and they serve as a location to hold both informal practice sessions and organized competitions for those engaged in recreational shooting. Shooting ranges also serve as training facilities for law enforcement officials and military personnel, as well as offering firearm and hunter education and safety courses. These courses provide invaluable hands-on instruction in the safe and proper handling and use of firearms.

Thank you to Governor Brad Little for signing this important shooting range protection legislation into law. Also, thank you to NRA Members and Second Amendment supporters for your calls and emails of support to your state lawmakers.

Nichols was asked by Idaho Dispatch about the bill in question. Here is what Nichols told Idaho Dispatch,

The main problem with H396 from 2020, which established a public shooting range fund is that it expanded Fish and Game power to develop and operate public shooting ranges in direct competition to private ones.

Members of some shooting ranges (like Blacks Creek) during Covid, were forced to shut down by F&G, even though it is an outdoor range. The range management was powerless because F&G called the shots. The situation would have been different if the management was directed by F&G. I wasn’t comfortable with the government controlling more and more shooting ranges.

Public Shooting ranges have a place, but if they are subsidized to the point where they push out private ones, the government can call the shots- who shoots, when what and how.

Nichols was given an “A” rating by the NRA in 2022 and received their endorsement.

Regarding the bribery allegation, Brock is now facing potential legal action from MRS, but Brock also said he was ready to counter sue.

Here are the images of the cease and desist letter sent on behalf of MRS to Brock (notes for the article listed below images):

Notes: The image of MRS is from East Idaho News. Additionally, the citizen in the tweet Brock sent is suing Idaho Dispatch Editor Greg Pruett in a countersuit, after a lawsuit was filed by Rep. Chad Christensen against the citizen pictured above. 


Tags: Bribery, District 10, Idaho Patient Act, Lawsuit, Medical Recovery Services, Scott Brock, State Senate, Tammy Nichols

5 thoughts on “Senate Candidate Scott Brock’s Bribery Claim Challenged, Lawsuit Threats Ensue

  1. If Mr. Brock were a true Constitutional conservative, why would he be challenging Rep. Nichols and not donating to her? Rep. Nichols is one of our proven super stars…
    Instead, he’s mudslinging and spreading lies.
    That lack of honor indicates to me that his motivations must be for personal gain and not for the gain of the people. A lot of property to develop in Star and Middleton, eh Scott?

    Unfortunately for him, many of his ilk, will be voted out this year.

  2. Brock totally lost my respect in 2020 when he jumped into the District 9 Senate race, making it a 3-way race between incumbent Patti Anne Lodge, Zach Brooks, and himself. He claims to be a conservative, and yet in a race where we likely had Lodge on the ropes (her ratings by IFF and other conservative organizations are terrible, and given her voting record, it is not hard to see why), his entry into the race allowed Lodge to win by a weak plurality.

    Now he challenges Tammy Nichols–one of the strongest conservative legislators we have. If Scott Brock were legitimate as a conservative candidate, he should take on some of the RINO candidates that really need to be primaried out.

    This latest move by Brock removes all credibility, as far as I’m concerned, as a potential conservative candidate. I hope his suit against Nichols snaps back in his face.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.