Idaho Dispatch

Your Local Media Ally

Sandpoint Mayor Claims “Many” Residents Contacted Him About Armed Citizens

By • June 17, 2020

Recently, a number of cities across Idaho had citizens who were armed and walking sidewalks and streets in the face of nationwide looting and destruction of businesses.

The armed citizens we talked to supported the protests against George Floyd’s death but just didn’t want to see Idaho experience the same destruction of local businesses that many other states were experiencing.

Idaho didn’t see nearly the amount of vandalism and destruction other states dealt with. Gun owners claimed that their presence was only intended to protect local businesses from looting and destruction.

However, that doesn’t mean everyone was happy about armed citizens standing guard over the town.

Sandpoint Mayor Shelby Rognstad claimed he received “many” contacts from constituents against the presence of armed citizens.

Mayor Rognstad made the claim on Facebook in a June 3rd Press Release where he expressed his displeasure with citizens exercising their 2nd Amendment rights.

You can see part of the post below and the full post here.

Rognstad claims that he “received many emails, messages, and calls last night” in regard to the armed citizens. It is this claim that a citizen of Idaho wanted to challenge and decided to do a public record’s request.

Idaho Dispatch obtained a copy of that request and the subsequent information provided to us to show how many messages were received by Mayor Rognstad.

The request was made by Drew Rinella of Cocolalla. The town of Cocolalla is approximately 15 minutes from Sandpoint.

From the documents we have, there appears to be a total of six complaints to the mayor about armed citizens.

One complaint was a voicemail, one was an email, and the other four appear to be text messages or Facebook messages to the mayor.

The question is, does this count the entirety of the “many” contacts the mayor received about armed citizens? Or are there messages the mayor has not disclosed.

Because this was an official Public Records Request, it would be required by law that all contacts the mayor received during the time period requested be disclosed if they were about the armed citizens. Mr. Rinella requested the documents for contacts made from June 2nd, the date of the protest, until June 3rd when the Facebook post was made.

Why did Mr. Rinella make the request in the first place? He told Idaho Dispatch, “My goal with this records request was simply to expose Mayor Rognstad’s lie that he received ‘many emails’ and messages on the day prior to his Facebook post condemning patriots for guarding the town.”

Are the six contacts from citizens what Mayor Rognstad considers to be “many?”

It does not appear that the mayor at any point indicated how many phone calls he received in the documents provided. It is possible the mayor received phone calls about the armed citizens, but he does not mention that in the documentation we received.

So, what would Mayor Rognstad define as “many” contacts from constituents?

The Meriam-Webster dictionary definition of “many” is “consisting of or amounting to a large but indefinite number.” If no phone calls were received, would six contacts from constituents constitute a “large number?”

If Mayor Rognstad is used to never getting contacts from his constituents then perhaps six contacts is a lot in comparison?

The concern of Mr. Rinella is that Mayor Rognstad was using his position to create a perception that there was widespread concern over armed citizens. Did the mayor inflate his contacts that day to instill shame on gun owners exercising their 2nd Amendment rights?

We have sent a request to Mayor Rognstad asking about the records request and have not yet received a response.

This article will be updated if the mayor responds to our request or posts something publicly.

Amazon Outlet

Tags: 2nd Amendment, Armed Citizens, Black Lives Matter, Drew Rinella, Idaho, Protests, Sandpoint, Shelby Rognstad

15 thoughts on “Sandpoint Mayor Claims “Many” Residents Contacted Him About Armed Citizens

  1. 6 is a pitifully-tiny number out of approximately 10,000 population (put another way: 6/10,000), compared to the constituency number who felt it necessary to lawfully protect their town. So why is it they felt the need to step up to protect their town?–perhaps because they don’t trust their mayor to do so. The mayor says, intentionallt using the negatively-charged term “vigilantes,” that “their impact was harmful.” Without evidence to support this when he said it, this simply exposes that he thinks legal firearms and their responsible owners are more dangerous than Antifa looting, occupying, and/or burning the town to the ground.

    On the note of his lie– “many emails, messages, and calls” –this specific grammar means “many emails, [many] messages, and [many] calls.” The “many” is implied in this construction, and the mayor knows it.

      1. We almost moved to Sandpoint, from Lewiston. We heard Mayor Rognstad, was anti-gun (no firearms at the festival etc). So much for the famed “we all get along” reputation the town has! More like we get along, as long as you bend the knee. We would have brought jobs with us. Sorry Sandpoint!

        p.s. I sent the mayor a email detailing why, we decided to not relocate. Did he respond NO!

    1. Read the second amendment, if you ban guns we will watch you beautiful city burn by protesters (most are from out of states). And lets see how many tourists you see.

    2. I know hundreds of people in the area. Maybe he ought to get out more. Because everyone I talk to or heard talk about it, rejoiced over it and took pride in our community because of it. Or wished people would do the same In Spokane.

      1. Sounds like that mayor needs to be voted out of town…. How was he voted for in the first place anyway??

      2. Apparently, 6 people registered a complaint that their armed neighbors were protecting Sandpoint against a potentially violent mob that has damaged, looted, and burned in other cities and states. Instead they should have been grateful that someone cared enough to actually make sure the senseless destruction doesn’t happen here. If there are 7,500 people living within the city limits and 6 complained, that is .0008 of the total who actually registered a complaint. The problem is not open carrying, which is legal in Idaho, it is a very few people who are afraid of their armed neighbors.

  2. “Counter anything that might get out of hand.” THAT is “shameful” for an elected official to say, after we’ve seen city after city across the country burn?

    As mayor, he ought to be educating those who claim to be afraid of the armed peacekeepers that they’re afraid of the wrong people.

  3. Go to a blue state and cry, sir. A constitutional carry state is just that. Suck it up or hop the border. Maybe CHOP or CHAZ or whatever their homeless encampment is called has a home for ya.

  4. Pants on fire! Need a new mayor who doesn’t prevaricate and promulgate Loony Lefty anti-2A BS like this guy. Got his butt handed to him in the Sandpoint City Council meeting last night. Darn awesome it was too.

  5. Recall this loony liberal gun grabbing anti 2A divisive mayor! You get what you vote for though. Why was he voted into office? Oh ya…because him and a bunch of other liberals moved into the area and want liberal gentrification and Idahoans United States Constitution and State rights stripped away to turn it into another liberal crap hole. This is Idaho! NOT $HITHOLE CALIFORNIA OR WASHINGTON OR OREGON! Everything democrat/liberal/socialist politicians touch they totally DESTROY AND RUIN! Vote the ALL out! #Trump2020

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *