Op-Ed: When “Privacy” Does Not ApplyBy Chuck Malloy • December 20, 2022
According to the Idaho Capital Sun, Idaho Congressman Mike Simpson underwent surgery recently and will be out until after the new year. He gave his proxy to his counterpart in the First District, Congressman Russ Fulcher.
Thank goodness, all is well for the longtime congressman.
“He is doing great and will be back in D.C. fully ready to vote on Jan. 3 for the start of the new Congress,” said Julia Horman, Simpson’s press secretary.Advertisement
It’s not much of a story, and there’s certainly nothing wrong with Simpson getting surgery. But there’s plenty wrong with how his office handled it. The breaking of the story should have come from his office, and not the Capital Sun. There’s no reason for the secrecy. If you live beyond 70 (Simpson is the same age as me, 72), body parts will need adjusting. I know people who have had knees, hips, shoulders and even hearts replaced. Many of these procedures are relatively routine by today’s standards, and people come back as good as new. Judging from his press secretary’s statement, it doesn’t appear that Simpson will be an exception.
Perhaps Simpson, and his office staff, would prefer to keep this private. But a congressman’s health status is in the public’s interest – whether it’s something serious such as a stroke or heart attack, or something routine. His constituents deserve to know if he is going to be out for any length of time, and who is casting votes on his behalf.
A few days ago, when Simpson’s surgery was not made public, I received a call from someone who talked about a number of horrible possibilities regarding to Simpson’s health – which is how ugly rumors get started. It would have been nice to counter that his office had sent out a news release indicating that Simpson was undergoing routine surgery and that everything was fine. His office gatekeepers blew this one.
Simpson is such a huge figure in the history of Idaho politics. Some 20 years ago, when I was writing editorials with the Idaho Statesman, I asked Simpson why voters should elect him to another term. He gave one of the best answers ever.
“Because I’m damn good,” Simpson told the editorial board.
We all just about fell out of our chairs with laughter. But, joking aside, he was damn good – insightful and funny, and a great one to interview.
Over the years, he has been good enough to keep winning elections while rising in the ranks of the Appropriations Committee – one of the most powerful committees in Congress for his constituency in the Second District. He was exceptional during his early days in Congress, when he made a point of building relationships with colleagues on both sides of the aisle. As a state legislator, he was a prime source for Statehouse reporters, including myself.
I remember a comment that the late Rep. James “Doc” Lucas, one of the great characters in Idaho politics, made about Simpson many years ago.
“There ain’t no substitute for intelligence.”
Old Doc was right. Simpson was maybe the brightest bulb in the Legislature at the time, and I’d guess that he’s one of the smartest people in Congress today. What’s refreshing about him is his independence – he doesn’t always go along with the party line. He was the lead player in wilderness designation for the Boulder White Clouds, and is probably the only Republican in Idaho who can win an election by being friendly to dam breaching. More recently, he was the only member in Idaho’s delegation to vote for the Respect of Marriage Act, and one of only 39 House Republicans. Ironically, the marriage act was sponsored in the Senate by someone else with an independent streak – Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, who recently left the Democratic Party to become an independent.
There’s no question about it, Simpson has guts, but he’s not so much in the public eye these days. Media access to him is limited, he avoids contentious town halls and he refused to debate his opponents in the primary and general election campaigns. We didn’t hear as much from Simpson as we could have. But to his credit, Simpson keeps on winning and he’ll probably have the job for as long as he wants. Who cares about anything else?
Chuck Malloy is a long-time Idaho journalist and columnist. He may be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
This Op-Ed was submitted by Chuck Malloy. Op-Eds do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of those at the Idaho Dispatch.
Tags: Appropriations, Congress, Congressman Russ Fulcher, Idaho 2nd Congressional District, Mike Simpson
11 thoughts on “Op-Ed: When “Privacy” Does Not Apply”
Simpson has been a liberal disaster from day one. To get elected once again his district needed to be expanded to include part of the woke blue voters in the city of Boise.
Simpson is nothing but a RINO and needs to be replaced as he generally votes with the communist democrats and does not represent conservative Idahoans.
I’m not sure voting for the “Respect For Marriage Act” is something to be trumpeted to Idaho conservatives. It doesn’t matter how smart or how funny one is in politics, what matters are one’s principles: see Mitt Romney vs Mike Lee. IMHO, Both Simpson and Crapo should step down and let a principled Conservative like Priscilla Giddings have the national spotlight.
Sadly, due to the ignorant electorate Simpson will, indeed, have the job for as long as he lives. Giving his proxy to Fulcher does not instill confidence. Might that be because Fulcher will vote the same? They say “Birds of a feather . . .”
Great observations and comment. Certainly this article will be criticized by those that let ideology get the upper hand to knowledge of subject matter and intelligence. Perhaps before relying on 4 letter word attitudes against conservative thought some of the folks expressing them will decide to go back to whichever political party they came from, certainly not Republican. Better yet, maybe they’ll run for office rather than merely run their mouths and thereby get a much better handle on the workings of government.
Fortunately I live in district 1. But my observations over many years tell me Simpson is RINO of the first order. This is the second article I have read from Chuck Malloy that tells me, loud and clear, this man is no conservative. Makes me begin to question the Idaho dispatch’s direction.
The weird is “unbiased” and fair. I know, likely a new concept for some.
Idaho Dispatch presents both sides. They did a poll awhile back and those that voted wanted to hear both sides.
As it should be, but putting lipstick on a pig (Simpson) is done much better over at some of the MSM outlets. This looks like more of a whitewash explicitly for conservative consumption.
So – according to Chuck “Mao” Malloy – Simpson is simply the smartest man in congress. Like ever. He’s wonderful because he’s “independent” (translation – votes with for the democrat agenda), stands with the radical alphabet crowd against traditional marriage, wants to destroy Idaho agriculture by tearing out vital dams, won’t meet with constituents (because they are contentious) or defend his record in election debates. Top that off with (according to Malloy) Simpson loves the adoration of the media, and you have the full-throated endorsement of him as Idaho’s own Mitt Romney. Maybe Simpson will show some real courage and come “out” as the true democrat he is at heart. Just like Malloy.
Simpson needs to retire. He has had way too many years in office. A RINO, BLUE TO THE CORE “REPUBLICAN”. NOT THE GUY I WANT REPRESENTING ME IN DC… DITTO FOR CRAPO AND RISCH. #ClevelandforSenate.