Complaint Filed Against Republican Candidate Critchfield for Alleged Campaign Finance Violations

By Greg Pruett • August 3, 2021

A complaint has been filed against a Republican candidate for State Superintendent of Education.

Debbie Critchfield is a candidate for State Superintendent of Education for the Republican Party. At least two Republicans have filed to run for the seat in the Republican Primary, and it is unclear if current Superintendent Sherri Ybarra is going to run for re-election.

The complaint filed against Critchfield alleges that she broke campaign finance laws by accepting donations that run contrary to Idaho’s Sunshine laws. Idaho’s Secretary of State office reviews complaints of alleged campaign finance violations.

The person who filed the complaint is a man named Tony Prudente. Additionally, two witnesses are also listed on the complaint, former Representative Bryan Zollinger and Maria Nate, wife of current Representative Ron Nate (R-Rexburg).

In the complaint, Prudente says that Critchfield accepted one donation of $5,000 (statewide candidate limit) from a man named Ryan Phipps.

On May 28, Phipps donated $5,000 to the Critchfield campaign, listing himself as the donor.

Then on May 28, Phipps donated another $5,000 under a business entity named “Western Mountain Construction.” On the same day, Phipps donated another $5,000 under a business entity titled “Western Mountain Inc.”

The complaint states the following law that was allegedly broken:

Idaho Campaign Finance law permits candidates for statewide office to receive donations of $5,000 per entity, per cycle. For these purposes, a business and an individual are considered separate entities. However, no single individual may donate in excess of $5,000 per cycle through more than one business. In other words, it is unlawful for a business owner to donate past the maximum limit even by funneling funds through multiple businesses that they directly control.

Listed in the complaint is a portion of the Idaho code (67-6610A(6)(c)) that Prudente, Nate, and Zollinger allege that Critchfield has violated:

According to the complaint, the donation from Phipps personally and one of his businesses was okay, but his donation from a secondary business under his control violated Idaho law.

Here are images of the donations themselves that can be found on the Secretary of State’s website:

Here are the images of the business entities that are also listed on the Secretary of State’s website (story continues below):

Idaho Dispatch attempted to reach Idaho Deputy Secretary of State Chad Houck for comment, but he has not responded at this time.

Additionally, Idaho Dispatch emailed Critchfield to find out if she had a response to the campaign finance allegation filed against her. The email listed on Critchfield’s website, debbieforidahoschools@gmail.com, came back as “Address Not Found.” Idaho Dispatch then used the contact form on Critchfield’s website to try and contact her.

We will keep Idahoans informed about any future developments on this story.

National Liberal Groups Distraught About Prop 1's Massive Defeat

Idaho High School Teacher's Anti-Trump Comments Go National

Democrats Lose Three Seats in Idaho Legislature Admidst Controversy in Another Close Race

Tags: Bryan Zollinger, Chad Hauk, Debbie Critchfield, Maria Nate, Ryan Phipps, Secretary of State, Tony Prudente

3 thoughts on “Complaint Filed Against Republican Candidate Critchfield for Alleged Campaign Finance Violations”

The article doesn’t address whether Ms. Critchfield was made aware of the second business donation. A follow up article should discuss this and whether or not Ms. Critchfield intends to return the second, illegal donation.
If Ms. Critchfield was not aware of the linkage between the two business donations, and if she promptly returns the second business donation, then this story is a non-issue going forward.
It would be interesting to know if the complainants tried to notify Ms. Critchfield before filing the complaint.

Sherri Ybbaa or whatever don’t get my vote. Because she hasn’t done a damn thing to give me as the PARENT the right to choose for my own children’s needs such as a mask. MAKE MASKS OPTIONAL !!!!!!