Interview with Dr. Ryan Cole Regarding Treatments for Covid-19
By Greg Pruett • September 1, 2021Idaho Dispatch had the opportunity to interview Dr. Ryan Cole, a Central District Health Board nominee.
Dr. Cole has come under criticism for some of his beliefs, including the use of Ivermectin in treating Covid-19 patients. However, Cole has insisted that Ivermectin is helping in saving patient’s lives.
Idaho Dispatch’s goal is always to tell both sides of a story and to let people who are being criticized an opportunity to defend their position or correct information they believe has been wrongly applied to them.
The goal of Idaho Dispatch is not to agree or disagree with Cole or any other person we interview but to allow readers to hear information from various sources, even if those sources disagree, and then determine for themselves what and who they want to believe.
Click on the image below to watch our interview with Dr. Cole:
In the interview, Idaho Dispatch asks Cole about the drug and why he believes it helps fight Covid-19. Additionally, we ask him about the Food and Drug Administrations’ disapproval of Ivermectin as a drug to use against Covid-19.
Cole also mentions several documents that he wanted to share with those who want to review his statements on the mechanisms of Ivermectin and Fenofibrate. Here are those documents that also contain additional links to information on those topics (story continues below the documents):
ivermectin mechanisms pdf Fenofibrate mechanisms pdfSome doctors disagree with Cole, and some doctors agree with Cole’s views and assessment of Ivermectin and its usage for Covid-19.
The FDA itself has approved Ivermectin for use in animals for deworming decades ago. Years after approving the usage of Ivermectin in animals, the FDA also approved it for use in humans for parasitic purposes, according to their website.
Recently, the FDA has warned Americans about the use of Ivermectin in treating Covid-19, which covers its approval and disapproval for various purposes.
For instance, the FDA says the following about Ivermectin and what they believe citizens need to know:
-
FDA has not approved ivermectin for use in treating or preventing COVID-19 in humans. Ivermectin tablets are approved at very specific doses for some parasitic worms, and there are topical (on the skin) formulations for head lice and skin conditions like rosacea. Ivermectin is not an anti-viral (a drug for treating viruses).
-
Taking large doses of this drug is dangerous and can cause serious harm.
-
If you have a prescription for ivermectin for an FDA-approved use, get it from a legitimate source and take it exactly as prescribed.
-
Never use medications intended for animals on yourself. Ivermectin preparations for animals are very different from those approved for humans.
The FDA goes on to state the following about how they have approved the use of Ivermectin:
Ivermectin tablets are approved by the FDA to treat people with intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis, two conditions caused by parasitic worms. In addition, some topical (on the skin) forms of ivermectin are approved to treat external parasites like head lice and for skin conditions such as rosacea.
Some forms of ivermectin are used in animals to prevent heartworm disease and certain internal and external parasites. It’s important to note that these products are different from the ones for people, and safe when used as prescribed for animals, only.
Finally, the FDA also says that Ivermectin can be unsafe, and here is why they say that it might be unsafe,
The FDA has not reviewed data to support use of ivermectin in COVID-19 patients to treat or to prevent COVID-19; however, some initial research is underway. Taking a drug for an unapproved use can be very dangerous. This is true of ivermectin, too.
There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. That is wrong.
Even the levels of ivermectin for approved uses can interact with other medications, like blood-thinners. You can also overdose on ivermectin, which can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension (low blood pressure), allergic reactions (itching and hives), dizziness, ataxia (problems with balance), seizures, coma and even death.
What do you think of the Ivermectin debate?
Let us know in the comments below.
Tags: Central District Health, Covid-19, Food and Drug Administration, Ivermectin, Ryan Cole
16 thoughts on “Interview with Dr. Ryan Cole Regarding Treatments for Covid-19”
Comments are closed.
The FDA is corrupt. Even if it wasn’t, people should have freedom to make personal medical decisions without big government intervening.
Dr. Cole has done his research, and has presented it for all to see. He has not been bought off by Pfizer, Moderna, and Big Pharma, unlike the multi-layer, revolving back door bureaucracies of the FDA, NIH, and CDC.
Dr. Ryan Cole will bring calmness and much needed insight to the Central District Health Board. We very much encourage and welcome his presence.
This is great news! Congrats to Dr. Ryan Cole.
I’ll trust anything he says over the media, the CDC and the FDA.
There’s no money for the hospitals/CDC/NIH/FDA in getting behind Ivermectin or HCQ. It’s always “follow the money” and folks are dying because of it!
So great to see honest, intelligent, fact based science and not on greedy politicians and corporations
Ivermectin is a generic drug that they cannot make millions on anymore. The head of the NIH is Fauxi’s wife and both are in bed with China along with theFDA, CDC AND WHO. They cannot be trusted as they only have their own pocketbooks at heart!
Since April 28, India medical officials started providing Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin to the population. Miraculously, COVID cases have plummeted quickly since then thanks to the new rules.
Japan recently decided to promote Ivermectin too as a treatment and prevention of covid19.
How can one with a sound mind doubt this?
Dr Cole is the voice of reason and we need more people like him in our world.
Please allow dnld of transcription
I am puzzled. The argument against Ivermectin seems to be that too many people are overdosing on it. So why don’t the powers that be prescribe it in the proper doses? Could it be that they can’t make enough money if they promote it? They are murderers. Money means more to them than saving lives.
“Ivermectin preparations for animals are very different from those approved for humans.”
So if it is different why not just say what the difference is FDA? Might add a little more credence to your vague statement. Or is it because there isn’t no difference?
Dr Cole is very specific, like he actually researched how it works. My kind of doctor. May God bless the people who put him in there.
The 1% livestock injectable can be used orally (and in fact, IS used orally quite frequently in animals as well), and its formulation is readily available on the package inserts (as required by law–by the same FDA that is complaining that “we don’t know what’s in it”). The two inert ingredients are glycerol and propylene glycol. Glycerol is used in LARGE amounts in human medicine as a stool softener and laxative. Propylene glycol is used in smaller amounts in human medical formulations to ensure proper moisture content, is used in some types of food coloring, and is also used as a de-icer in any applications where there is any risk of it leaking into food sources, since it is non-toxic. So neither ingredient is an issue to ingest in the small quantities of ivermectin in appropriate human doses. To find human dosages, go to the FLCCC Alliance web site. For some helpful calculations: 0.2 mg per kg is the equivalent of 0.1 mg per 1.1 pounds, which equals 10 mg per 110 lbs. The 1% solution is 10 mg per 1 ml, so the dosage is 1 ml per 110 lbs.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-plus-protocol/
Good luck finding it to purchase.
Just look at the countries in Africa and other areas that use Ivermectin regularly to control parasites in people. Their Covid cases are minimal. The fact that this drug is used regularly in many countries without negative consequences is proof of its safety. Why do we need trials when we have clear evidence from years of use proving its safety and effectiveness in people?
About 250 million people take ivermectin every year, and side effects are extremely rare!e
My doctor Is one of only Less than a handful of doctors at the hospital who will prescribe Therapeutics ivermectin HCQ decadron colchicine Vit D Vit C zinc melatonin adult aspirin.
HCQ has to be EARLY as soon as EXPOSURE is known. Even if no symptoms
He started early last year and HAS NOT LOST A PATIENT TO COVID. No matter what medical condition !!!
He DID LOSE a patient to the SHOT !!
Dr. Cole is finally the first person that I have heard say THE FDA HAS NOT GOT ONE THERAPUTIC ON THEIR COVID TREATMENT SITE !! WHY NOT???
FURTHER. FAUCI IS A FRAUD FOR THE VERY SAME REASON. HE SAID EARLY ON HE CANNOT APPROVE THERAPEUTIC USE BECAUSE THERE WERE NO DOUBLE BLIND PEER REVIEWED STUDIES BLAH BLAH. WHERE ARE THE STUDIES ???? HE’S HAD 18 MONTHS.
THANK YOU DR COLE Let’s hope you’re waking the zombi doctors I was beginning to think that maybe there was a contest between them to see how many patients they were losing to Covid
And yes Dennis. It’s the money. The fear campaign is to Get people the shot to mess with their immunity and cause them to need to continue to be jabbed. $$.
The Recovered have natural immunity. Dr Cole needs to come back and explain how the Covid recovered should be able to prove their natural immunity by the proper Tcell test.
Antibodies hide so they are not the fool proof test that confirms immunity.