Cleveland For Congress
Cleveland For Congress

Idaho Dispatch

Your Local Media Ally

Op-Ed: Winder’s Senate, not the IFF, is biggest threat facing Idaho and the nation

By • June 10, 2021

Senate Pro Tem Chuck Winder insulted conservative Idahoans this week when he told the City Club of Boise that the Idaho Freedom Foundation is the “biggest threat to democracy” the state faces.

First of all, this is not a democracy. It’s a constitutional republic. But that said, in reality it’s Winder and his Senate that is a threat—not just to Idaho, but to the entire country.

Remember that it was Winder and most of his Senate colleagues who voted multiple times to fund programs that teach young people that America is inherently racist and the way to combat systemic racism is to support socialism and communism. Winder and his Senate colleagues can bitch and moan that it’s not happening, but it is. We’ve provided ample proof, from Boise State University’s own efforts to drive a pro-police coffee shop off campus to the University of Idaho’s blatant support for Black Lives Matters. We’ve also documented how Idaho undergraduate students must navigate a gauntlet of social justice courses and departments in order to earn a degree.

Winder and the state Senate listened to the progressive media, kowtowed to leftist special interest groups, ignored the evidence, and voted to continue social justice indoctrination on our college and university campuses. Thankfully, some outstanding conservative House members, working in tandem with the IFF’s research staff, were able to counter the Senate and offer a better course: a multimillion dollar cut to university social justice programs and a restriction on the publicly-funded indoctrination critical race theory in Idaho.

Remember that Winder also cast the deciding vote to give $6 million to a pre-kindergarten organization that promotes exposing babies and toddlers to social justice and critical race theory. The legislative session ended with the bill on hold in the House, again thanks to conservative state representatives. Had Winder’s Senate gotten its way, plenty of money would have gone toward getting kids out of their homes and away from their parents so that their young minds could be shaped to support the LBGTQ agenda, radical environmentalism, and union organizers.

Winder is also responsible for leading a Senate that refused to meaningfully restrain the governor’s executive powers, end the state of emergency, reject federal handouts, end mask mandates, or provide substantive property tax relief.

It is a fact that when you look at Winder’s voting record, the records of Senate Republican committee chairmen, and the record of Senate Democrats, there is very little daylight between them. They are all very much oriented toward socialism. Oh sure, Winder and his colleagues will cast the perfunctory votes needed to seem conservative, occasionally voting pro-life or pro-gun. But on a wide range of other topics, Winder and most other senators have nothing to offer but a bigger, more expensive, and more burdensome cradle to grave government.

Isn’t it interesting that the usual progressive education and business special interests don’t offend Winder? That’s because he and most of his colleagues in the Senate do those interests’ bidding more often than not. They’re comfortably in bed together.

Yet Winder is threatened by the Freedom Foundation? Why? What is so scary about our continued and unflinching support of limited government and conservative values?

Throughout its history, America has served as a beacon of hope and opportunity for the world. But today, many groups are attempting to undermine our constitutional republic. Other states are already deeply drenched in socialism. For them, there may be no going back. Idaho was well on its way to the same fate before the IFF arrived on the scene almost 13 years ago.

Last session, the Idaho Freedom Foundation and Idaho Freedom Action got thousands of Idahoans to call and write their legislators urging them to defend American principles. And that’s what has Winder so upset.

That’s why I say he and the state Senate are the greatest threat to our state and our nation. Not the Idaho Freedom Foundation. Winder is either with us, in the trenches, fighting to save the country, or he’s on the other side.

Amazon Outlet


Tags: Chuck Winder, Idaho Freedom Action, Idaho Freedom Foundation, Wayne Hoffman

5 thoughts on “Op-Ed: Winder’s Senate, not the IFF, is biggest threat facing Idaho and the nation

  1. Wayne,
    We very much appreciate the Freedom Index for the House and Senate. It helps to cut through the haze to see who to actually vote for.

    In addition can Freedom Index equivalents be produced for:
    1.) Idaho’s elected Judiciary. We are asked to blindly vote on people we know nothing of. This is not correct.
    2.) Larger or All county’s: County Commissioners, City Council and Mayor.

    1. I second this! We need more in-depth information about those we are expected to vote for or against! In looking at previous voting years and those whom I and my wife are voting for, the only information we are able to find is what’s on the internet about each person, and sometimes they don’t even come up in searches!
      Please, PLEASE (!!!) publish indices on all who wish to run for a seat in Idaho’s government at every level! And this includes positions for state-funded higher education seats!

  2. The work being done by IFF is invaluable to the safeguarding of citizen rights in Idaho. The research and information provided by IFF allow others without those resources to better understand who, and what, we are really voting for. With the exception of only a small handful of officials, I have determined that much of the government in Idaho are gutless RINOs or progressive nut-jobs, including Gov. Little (who will never get my vote again), who are doing little to prevent Idaho becoming another Kalifornia. It would be very, very helpful to have IFF provide a Conservative Voter’s Guide for 2022 and 2024… I would trust this far more than I would trust any other kind of information being put out there.

  3. The IFF is libertarian in their views. They also claim to love the constitution except for when they don’t. (See Wayne’s comments regarding education). Now they are openly attacking anyone who doesn’t fall in line and vote their agenda. How does anyone still support a lobbyist group that is more into name calling, litmus tests for values, and demands elected politicians adhere to an agenda instead of what their constituents want? The majority of Idaho is not extreme libertarian. They are conservative to be sure, thank goodness, but not so dumb to blindly follow the agenda of a secretive money funded lobbyist group.

Leave a Reply to A Ridgeback in Eagle Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *